1989 Citroen XM vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (110 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 402 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (255 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen XM | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Citroen | Mahindra |
| Model | XM | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2088 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1782 kg |
