1989 Citroen XM vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 905 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | Econoline |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3510 mm |