1989 Citroen XM vs. 2003 Ford F-250
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 2003 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-250 (474 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 2003 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen XM | 2003 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | XM | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3490 mm |
