1989 Citroen XM vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster

To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 470 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (225 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (140 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster. 2003 Mazda Roadster has automatic transmission and 1989 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1989 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 2003 Mazda Roadster
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM Roadster
Year Released 1989 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1905 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 141 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 225 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 83.6 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4970 mm 3960 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2270 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 48 L