1989 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Citroen C2
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C2 (123 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (108 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 254 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2004 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Citroen | Citroen |
Model | XM | C2 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1083 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 41 L |