1989 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Ford C-MAX

To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 78 kg more than 2004 Ford C-MAX.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (225 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 2004 Ford C-MAX
Make Citroen Ford
Model XM C-MAX
Year Released 1989 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1905 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 141 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 225 Nm 197 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1422 kg
Vehicle Length 4970 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 59 L