1989 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (169 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 16 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (240 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (221 Nm). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 6 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |