1989 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6. 1989 Citroen XM has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Citroen XM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 2004 Mazda 6
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM 6
Year Released 1989 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2975 cc 1798 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 64 L