1989 Citroen XM vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (141 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 760 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (225 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: