1989 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2004 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saab 05-Sep (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (108 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saab 05-Sep weights approximately 237 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saab 05-Sep (309 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2004 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Citroen | Saab |
Model | XM | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 309 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |