1989 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2490 mm |