1989 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM. 1989 Citroen XM has automatic transmission and 2005 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Citroen XM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | XM | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |