1989 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2005 Smart ForFour is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart ForFour (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (116 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart ForFour. (100 Nm). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2005 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | XM | ForFour |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 100 Nm |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |