1989 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Subaru Impreza

To start off, 2005 Subaru Impreza is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Subaru Impreza (227 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Impreza should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Impreza weights approximately 62 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Subaru Impreza is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Impreza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Subaru Impreza (294 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm). This means 2005 Subaru Impreza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 2005 Subaru Impreza
Make Citroen Subaru
Model XM Impreza
Year Released 1989 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2088 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Horse Power 108 HP 227 HP
Torque 235 Nm 294 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 21.5:1 8.0:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1337 kg 1399 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.9 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 60 L