1989 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (217 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (340 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM. 1989 Citroen XM has automatic transmission and 2005 Volvo S40 has manual transmission. 2005 Volvo S40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Citroen XM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | XM | S40 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 340 Nm |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |