1989 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (257 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen XM | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | XM | S60 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 257 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2760 mm |
