1989 Citroen XM vs. 2006 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (156 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 486 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2006 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | XM | CR-V |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2630 mm |