1989 Citroen XM vs. 2008 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2008 Dodge Dakota is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 75 kg more than 2008 Dodge Dakota.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (225 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2008 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | XM | Dakota |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 83 L |