1989 Citroen XM vs. 2008 Mazda 2
To start off, 2008 Mazda 2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 175 kg more than 2008 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2008 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 2 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 214 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2500 mm |