1989 Citroen XM vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | XM | S60 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 248 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |