1989 Citroen XM vs. 2009 Mazda 2

To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 49 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 2009 Mazda 2
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM 2
Year Released 1989 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1399 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 67 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 160 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 73.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 82 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Top Speed 193 km/hour 160 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1329 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.9 L/100km 4.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 45 L