1989 Citroen XM vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 545 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (225 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 6 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |