1989 Citroen XM vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (240 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 295 kg more than 2009 Mazda Tribute.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda Tribute (302 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 2009 Mazda Tribute
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM Tribute
Year Released 1989 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2975 cc 2960 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 168 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6550 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 62 L