1989 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Bravo (119 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 2010 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM. 1989 Citroen XM has automatic transmission and 2010 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 2010 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Citroen XM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | XM | Bravo |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 206 Nm |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 197 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2810 mm |