1989 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (110 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 170 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (255 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | C-Max |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2788 mm |