1989 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 5 weights approximately 238 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 5. (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 5 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1552 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1753 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |