1989 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,904 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 29 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (177 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM. 2010 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1989 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1989 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1904 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1382 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |