1989 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 2010 Toyota Sequoia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Toyota Sequoia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Sequoia (543 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 2010 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2010 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | XM | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 543 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3099 mm |