1989 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (141 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 49 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (225 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | XM | C30 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |