1989 Citroen XM vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | F-250 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 132 L |