1989 Citroen XM vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 114 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | XM | C30 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |