1989 Citroen XM vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (199 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (108 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 166 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (258 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1989 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1989 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | XM | ATS |
Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 199 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 11.4 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1503 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1418 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 61 L |