1989 Citroen XM vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen XM | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Citroen | Smart |
| Model | XM | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1867 mm |
