1989 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2002 Suzuki F1

To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Daihatsu Charade (75 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Charade should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1989 Daihatsu Charade.

Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Charade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki F1 (106 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Daihatsu Charade. (102 Nm). This means 2002 Suzuki F1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Daihatsu Charade. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1989 Daihatsu Charade has manual transmission. 1989 Daihatsu Charade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: