1989 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 526 kg more than 1989 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Daihatsu Leeza | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Leeza | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 95.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 72.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2420 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 125 L |
