1989 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 1966 Volvo 120
To start off, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Volvo 120 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1989 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 1966 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Daihatsu Leeza | 1966 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
| Model | Leeza | 120 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 45 L |
