1989 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Daihatsu Leeza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Daihatsu Leeza would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotus M250 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1989 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Daihatsu Leeza | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Lotus |
| Model | Leeza | M250 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 72 L |
