1989 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Daihatsu Leeza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Daihatsu Leeza would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 920 kg more than 1989 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Daihatsu Leeza | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Leeza | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 4009 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 100.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 60 L |
