1989 Daihatsu Leeza vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Daihatsu Leeza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Daihatsu Leeza would be higher. At 2,442 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo V50 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1989 Daihatsu Leeza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Volvo V50 has automatic transmission and 1989 Daihatsu Leeza has manual transmission. 1989 Daihatsu Leeza will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo V50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Daihatsu Leeza | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Leeza | V50 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 548 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 60 L |