1989 De Tomaso Pantera vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera (350 HP) has 291 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 De Tomaso Pantera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera (452 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 1989 De Tomaso Pantera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 De Tomaso Pantera | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Nissan |
| Model | Pantera | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 452 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2420 mm |
