1989 De Tomaso Pantera vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 De Tomaso Pantera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 De Tomaso Pantera would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera (350 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 De Tomaso Pantera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera (452 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 1989 De Tomaso Pantera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1989 De Tomaso Pantera | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | De Tomaso | Nissan |
Model | Pantera | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 452 Nm | 192 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |