1989 De Tomaso Pantera vs. 2009 Volkswagen CC
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen CC is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 De Tomaso Pantera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 De Tomaso Pantera would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera (350 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen CC. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen CC.
Because 1989 De Tomaso Pantera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 De Tomaso Pantera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen CC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 De Tomaso Pantera (452 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen CC. (207 Nm). This means 1989 De Tomaso Pantera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen CC.
Compare all specifications:
1989 De Tomaso Pantera | 2009 Volkswagen CC | |
Make | De Tomaso | Volkswagen |
Model | Pantera | CC |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 452 Nm | 207 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1860 mm |