1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura EL weights approximately 84 kg more than 1989 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura EL (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Dodge Colt | 2000 Acura EL | |
| Make | Dodge | Acura |
| Model | Colt | EL |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2619 mm |
