1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Dodge Colt (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Colt weights approximately 135 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Dodge Colt (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1989 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Colt | 2003 Ford Ka | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Colt | Ka |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2460 mm |