1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Colt weights approximately 115 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Dodge Colt (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Colt | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Colt | 2 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |