1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1989 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (244 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Dodge Colt 2003 Mazda 6
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Colt 6
Year Released 1989 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1837 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 153 Nm 244 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1195 kg 1410 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2270 mm