1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (133 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1989 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S40 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Colt | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Colt | S40 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2570 mm |