1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Because 2006 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Colt | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Colt | DrifterX |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3010 mm |