1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 410 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 477 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Colt | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Colt | CLS |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |