1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Bravo (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 440 kg more than 1989 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Bravo (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Colt | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Colt | Bravo |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2610 mm |